Memory (second viewing) ๐Ÿง โŒโŒ

Michel Franco’s “Memory” returns with some notable changes, offering a more streamlined yet still emotionally charged experience. While the film retains its core strengths, it also introduces new elements that both enhance and complicate the narrative.

### Refined Storytelling

The revised version of “Memory” addresses one of the main criticisms of its predecessor by tightening the pacing. The film now feels less long-winded, allowing the story to unfold more efficiently without sacrificing its emotional depth[1]. This adjustment helps maintain viewer engagement throughout the runtime.

### Powerful Performances Remain

Jessica Chastain and Peter Sarsgaard continue to deliver compelling performances as Sylvia and Saul, respectively. The confrontation scene, a highlight of the original cut, remains a tour de force, showcasing the actors’ ability to convey complex emotions with nuance and intensity[1][3].

### A More Satisfying Conclusion

The ending has been reworked to provide greater clarity and emotional resonance. Sylvia and Saul’s decision to be together now feels more organic, with the added approval of Sylvia’s daughter lending a sense of closure to the family dynamic[1]. This change addresses previous concerns about the abruptness of their relationship’s development.

### Inconsistencies in Saul’s Condition

While the film’s improvements are notable, some issues persist. Saul’s portrayal of dementia raises questions about consistency. His ability to remember Sylvia’s daughter shortly after meeting her and his familiarity with complex systems like intercoms seem at odds with his supposed memory impairment[1]. This inconsistency may distract viewers and undermine the authenticity of his condition.

### Career Transition Lacks Clarity

The film still struggles to clearly communicate Sylvia’s career trajectory. The passing mention of her leaving her job feels insufficient, leaving audiences to fill in the blanks about this significant life change[1]. A more explicit exploration of this transition could have provided valuable insight into Sylvia’s character development.

### Questionable Parenting Choices

A new element that raises eyebrows is Sylvia’s approach to parenting, particularly her use of material gifts like an iPhone to win her daughter’s affection[1]. This portrayal of parenting through consumerism adds a layer of complexity to Sylvia’s character but may not sit well with all viewers.

### Conclusion

The revised “Memory” addresses some of the original’s shortcomings while introducing new elements that both enhance and complicate the narrative. While it remains a powerful exploration of trauma and connection, the film still grapples with issues of consistency and character development. Despite these flaws, “Memory” continues to be a thought-provoking drama that benefits from strong performances and a more focused narrative approach.

8/10

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *